Dirty business. Image: Steve Buissinne
The high court has upheld a legal challenge to the government’s plan to procure 1.5GW of new coal-fired power, ruling that it was unlawful because of the potential impact on public health.
Plans for more electricity from the dirtiest fossil fuel in South Africa, which has the most carbon-intensive economy among the G20 nations, violate the constitutional right to health, Judge CJ van der Westhuizen wrote in a ruling released on Wednesday.
Three environmental activist groups filed the case against the energy minister and energy regulator as well as President Cyril Ramaphosa after the government disclosed its intentions in a 2019 energy plan that the ministry approved in 2020.
South Africa relies on coal for about 80% of its power and has some of the world’s worst air quality
Those decisions are “unlawful and invalid”, the judge said, ordering the minister and regulator to pay costs to the complainants.
This is another victory for activists in the country who have already won rulings stating that the government needs to enforce laws designed to limit pollution from burning coal and blocking some offshore oil exploration.
Still, South Africa relies on coal for about 80% of its power and has some of the world’s worst air quality. Pollution from the fuel causes ailments ranging from respiratory illness to strokes and heart attacks with Eskom admitting its emissions kill hundreds of people annually.
When the case was first filed, then-energy minister Gwede Mantashe said that securing the right to use coal for new power plants was worth a court battle.
Renewables
Even so, South Africa is pressing ahead with plans to reduce its reliance on coal by ordering additional renewable energy and implementing a US$9.3-billion climate finance pact with some of the world’s richest nations.
Read: South Africa seeks billions in climate funds even as it keeps coal plants open
Mantashe and some other politicians have argued that the switch to clean electricity will jeopardise energy security and could cost tens of thousands of jobs that depend on the mining and burning of coal. — Antony Sguazzin, (c) 2024 Bloomberg LP
Get breaking news from TechCentral on WhatsApp. Sign up here
Don’t miss:
‘South Africa can’t afford this’: Eskom price hike plan under fire
Comments